下面是范文網(wǎng)小編分享的GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀3篇，歡迎參閱。
GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀1
題目：
It is unfortunate but true that political decisions and activities affect all aspects of people's lives.
盡管很不幸，但是這卻是真實存在的事實，政治決策和活動影響著人們生活的方方面面。
正文：
Human beings are social animal and therefore highly dependent on political activities.While the word unfortunate is not always applicable in all circumstances, we have to admit that political decisions and activities affect our lives in all aspects.
One should notice and avoid misinterpretation of the term "all" in this viewpoint, as it does not equal going to extreme but merely indicates what is going on. Those who misunderstand often argue that their fundamental right to decide when to sleep, what to eat, where to go on their own will has always been left to themselves and has nothing to do with what the president had said or signed. Yet this is not the case at all.The moment when we enjoy our sweet dream while jobless people are picking waste bottles on the street, when we choose cabbage to be our daily recipe only because we can not afford high beef consumption, when we are forced not to travel during the SARS outbreak, political decisions are pulling us around. Personal rights sometimes give way to political decisions no matter voluntarily or unwillingly. Needless to say, political decisions become much more influential when it comes to other issues.Everyday we are directed in an invisible yet powerful way, so powerful that in no aspect of our lives can we evade.
GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀
GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀2
Issue
"People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."
Sample Essay
Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of "synergy", where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.
Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic "Type A" personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.
Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.
Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole "sum" but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.
Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.
Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.
觀點陳述型作文/[題目]
“當人們以團隊的形式工作時，要比以孤軍奮戰(zhàn)的形式來得更加富有成效。團隊的協(xié)同工作需要相互合作，它比個人競爭更能激勵人們?！?/p>
[范文正文]
總體而言，團隊的協(xié)同工作自然能通過“增效作用”(Synergy)這一理念而帶來更高程度的整體生產(chǎn)效率，因為在這里，整體大于個體相加之總和。然則，當人們以團隊的形式工作時，要比以孤軍奮戰(zhàn)的形式來得更加富有成效"這一觀念注定會產(chǎn)生巨大差異，取決于所組織起來的團隊的類別，團隊與個人所能獲得的終極回報或激勵，以及個人本身。
關于個人，有些人天生就具有獲取成功的欲望，無論他們所面臨的情形或任務是什么。這些人會演變?yōu)楣ぷ骺襁@一經(jīng)典的“A類”人格，因為受到一股內心的熱火所驅使，這股熱火時刻告訴他們必須不停地“有所事事”，無論是作為個人抑或是作為團隊的一分子。另一些人則可能希望不必那么多地介入社會，或者他們傾向于與其他人激烈競爭。對這些人而言，作為個人，他們工作起來會最富有成效，因為由于他們根本就不想成為任何團隊的一部分，與他人合作便會限制他們的效率。這一思想傾向是否與生俱有，還是隨著時間的推移而形成，這都無關緊要。這僅僅只是他們的一種生存狀態(tài)，無論是動機還是回報，都無法在其內心深處激發(fā)起作為一個團隊集體工作的欲望。
有些人，由于社會互動以及與他人協(xié)作去實現(xiàn)某種集體努力的欲望，而具有極強的動機。顯然，這些個人在作為團隊的一部分進行工作時，他們便會處在其最富有成效的狀態(tài)。組織行為學研究表明，亞洲文化更有可能形成此類集體性行為，與那種常和西方文化聯(lián)系在一起的較為個人主義的行為構成對比。這樣，人們自然會認為，某些文化價值觀可以決定人們是否作為個人還是作為團隊的一部分工作起來最富有成效。
GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀3
GRE寫作高頻作文題為何受歡迎?
很多同學在備考GRE作文的時候，之所以對“高頻”情有獨鐘，實際上思想根源還是希望能減少工作量，說得通俗一點，也就是還是抱有“投機取巧”的心理。這些同學的想法往往是：GRE官方的題庫給出的200多道題太多了，看高頻可以減低我的工作量(也就是不需要把200多道題目都看完)，如果在考試的時候遇到高頻題目，而我正好寫過的話，那么分數(shù)就是有保證的。或者，至少比寫一篇完全沒有看過的文章要強。如果我們把這些同學的看法當做一個論證的過程來找找其中的邏輯問題的話，大家就能明白為什么說“高頻只是個傳說了”。
從GRE作文論證結構角度看高頻題作用
在這個論證過程中，同學首先假設了一個前提，就是“寫一篇已經(jīng)寫過的文章得到高分的可能性大于寫一篇沒有寫過的文章”?？墒?，我們考慮一下，如果本身這篇文章從一開始按照這個同學的分析思路，包括寫作的語言就存在巨大問題的話，那么，即使是考試的時候照著抄一遍，分數(shù)也仍然會是很低的。因此，只有當你的寫作思路正確，分析過程正確，語言表達正確這幾個條件都滿足的時候，對于題目的熟練程度，或者是否寫過某個題目的作文，才會影響到最后的分數(shù)。當然，我們還同時忽略了考場上的臨場狀態(tài)的變化問題。
而反之，如果一個考生有正確的分析思路和寫作思路，有比較好的語言表達能力，那其實考試的時候是否寫過某個題目就變得不重要了，因為最終他的能力會很好地解決題目熟悉程度的問題。比如我們所熟悉的高考語文中進行的作文測試，我們實際上是完全不知道考試會出現(xiàn)什么題目的，我們平時練習的時候，也基本上不會考慮考試的時候是否會遇到同樣的題目，但是最終，寫作能力比較好，思維方式比較正確，知識面比較寬的同學往往會在作文中得到高分。
從這個角度來看，實際上在準備作文的過程中，練習的題目是否是高頻并不重要，而重要的是，是否通過練習形成了正確的分析思路，寫作思路，并且讓語言的表達正確。
GRE寫作高頻題其實沒那么好用
另外，很多人也認為“高頻”題目在考試時被抽到的可能性更大，并且還有人會計算題目出現(xiàn)的概率。為了讓大家都能看明白，我不會在這里建立一個模型來計算什么題目出現(xiàn)的概率較大，我們只考慮如下的一些問題。首先，ETS在從開放題庫中抽取題目給考生的時候，是一種隨機的選擇方式，那么，每個題目被抽取到的概率是完全一樣的。而現(xiàn)在并沒有證據(jù)表明ETS在抽取題目的時候采用了任何優(yōu)先級策略，所以我們不能對此作出主觀假設。第二，從目前的高頻統(tǒng)計方式來看，存在著很大的漏洞。
大家不妨計算一下每天有多少人去參加GRE的作文考試，一年下來又有多少人參加作文考試，其中在網(wǎng)上發(fā)布題目的人的比例有多少，而發(fā)布出來的題目被統(tǒng)計的又有多少。如果這些數(shù)據(jù)本身都沒有確切值的話，那么統(tǒng)計的樣本首先就是存在問題的。而“高頻”的出現(xiàn)，很可能是“馬太效應”的結果，即在很長一段時間里面，A題目被大多數(shù)人關注，于是成為了“高頻”的一部分，于是，有人考到了這個題目，在網(wǎng)上發(fā)了帖子，那么這個題目的關注度繼續(xù)上升。而那些“低頻”的題目，即使有人發(fā)了，也沒人去關注，但是很可能在一段時間后，某個“低頻”的題目其實出現(xiàn)的頻率很高了，但是卻依然沒有人去關注它。因此，要想得到科學的統(tǒng)計，必須有一個平臺，來隨時完整統(tǒng)計大多數(shù)人在考試中遇到的題目的情況，并且實時更新，才能得到較為準確的數(shù)據(jù)。
因此，在備考GRE作文的過程中，其實是否準備網(wǎng)絡流傳的“高頻”題目并不重要，而重要的是，無論準備什么題目，都能有正確的思考路徑和分析方法，并且能夠用正確的語言來表達自己的想法。當系統(tǒng)化的思維方式和準確的語言表達習慣形成的時候，無論什么題目都沒有問題。此外，如果希望消除題目熟練度的影響，大量閱讀題目，并且寫作提綱是必要的，其中也包括對題目的分析和簡單的邏輯結構梳理。
以上就是小編為各位考生整理的關于合理對待GRE高頻作文介紹，希望考生積極做好備考工作，及時調整好狀態(tài)，爭取在GRE寫作考試中取得理想的成績!
GRE寫作高頻題資源解讀3篇相關文章：