下面是范文網(wǎng)小編整理的GRE作文之錯誤寫作思路3篇，供大家參考。
GRE作文之錯誤寫作思路1
Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
法律不應(yīng)該是僵化或固定的，而應(yīng)該根據(jù)不同的環(huán)境、時期和地點(diǎn)而足夠靈活。
GRE寫作范文：
Should laws be stable and fixed or be flexible in taking consideration of various factors such as circumstances, times and places? The speaker concludes that instead of being stationary, laws should be constantly changing. The speaker’s claim have merits in declaring that law should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances since adaptation to changing social environment is how the law properly guard the function of social engine and the general welfare of people as a whole. But to some extent, we would not go too much in neglecting to importance of the stability of laws because they are the principles we adhere to in our daily life, if changed too abruptly and constantly, will result in egregious chaos and confusion.
Keeping stability, consistency of laws is indispensable in helping people to make prediction of the consequence of their behaviors and figure out the legal obligation and rights exerted upon them by the legal system. In the personal level, consistency of laws defines the properness and legality of their doings and thus endows people with sense of security and good citizenship. If as the speaker claimed that laws should never be stationary or fixed, people face the threat of being constantly threw into turbid mud of bewilderment and insecurity and finally lose their sight in how to adapt to sudden alternation of in this aspect or another.
Another example that aptly illustrates this is in the field of business. As we know, the ultimate goal of a business is to maximize its profit of shareholders within the framework of laws to define that a enterprises function within this framework, obey its obligation and hamper no interest of the general welfare of the society. In order for a enterprises to thrive, it must carefully study the relevant business laws, including anti-dumping law and torts, etc.Given the choice, most leaders are unwilling to see the prospect that laws are constantly changing since it takes time and effort to build a well-defined frames within companies and overthrow established practice and code would demand another round of revising and reevaluation....
GRE作文
GRE作文之錯誤寫作思路2
論述流于表面不夠深入
中國考生經(jīng)歷了中考高考等考試，習(xí)慣了八股文式的作文寫作方式，容易泛泛而談，常缺少對題目本身的復(fù)雜性理解。大家在審題時往往容易流于表面，只根據(jù)材料給出的內(nèi)容做一些淺顯表層的論述，而很少發(fā)現(xiàn)題目的本質(zhì)并從更深層次展開討論。想要取得作文高分，考生就應(yīng)注意作文題目的隱含意義，避開簡單的非對即錯的思想，對題目進(jìn)行辯證地分析與思考，從多維度進(jìn)行解讀，從而寫出更有深度的文章。
老掉牙的案例還在用
不少同學(xué)在GRE寫作中闡述一個觀點(diǎn)時，缺乏充分的、確切的例證，用來用去都是一些家喻戶曉、乏善可陳的例子，例如最典型的比爾蓋茨和愛迪生，而有些同學(xué)甚至?xí)霈F(xiàn)例子本身和觀點(diǎn)關(guān)聯(lián)甚微，牽強(qiáng)附會的情況，這樣的作文自然會讓考官看起來味同爵蠟，不知所云，分?jǐn)?shù)被扣在所難免。其實(shí)這個問題與考生的知識面狹窄、視野不夠開闊、思維不夠跳躍等等都有很大的關(guān)系。小編建議大家平時要多注意對寫作素材的積累，比如看每日經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)人，擴(kuò)大自己的知識面。
寫作速度太慢沒寫完
考生平時缺少打字練習(xí)或者思維活動太慢，導(dǎo)致寫作速度一直提不上去，首先表現(xiàn)在字?jǐn)?shù)不夠上，其次字?jǐn)?shù)不夠也直接導(dǎo)致了內(nèi)容的不充分，自己的思想無法完全展開。GRE寫作一般分為5段，開頭結(jié)尾及中間3段，一篇好的GRE作文一般字?jǐn)?shù)在450-600字，字?jǐn)?shù)多雖然不能說一定是篇佳作，但最起碼會讓你的內(nèi)容略顯豐富。
開頭結(jié)尾缺乏吸引力
中國古時形容一篇佳作通常用鳳頭豹尾，形容其精彩，GRE作文高分的關(guān)鍵也切不可忽視開頭和結(jié)尾，在時間匆忙的情況下，這兩段直接影響了考官對你的第一印象，第一段點(diǎn)明自己的觀點(diǎn)和立場，結(jié)尾總結(jié)，全篇結(jié)構(gòu)完整，條理清晰，再加之充分的例證，是獲得高分的關(guān)鍵。開頭如果無法吸引考官，結(jié)尾又寫得草草了事，這樣的文章想必很難給人留下好印象。
GRE作文之錯誤寫作思路3
GRE作文題目：
Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
人們總是在尋找相同點(diǎn)，即使是在非常不同的事物間也不例外，甚至有時候這樣做是無用乃至有害的。實(shí)際上，我們應(yīng)該具體問題具體分析;我們應(yīng)該盡量避免比較的傾向。
GRE寫作正文：
In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.
Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one
May not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.
Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.
In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.
GRE作文之錯誤寫作思路3篇相關(guān)文章：
★ 托福聽力記筆記錯誤思路實(shí)例分析3篇 托福聽力筆記技巧總結(jié)