下面是范文網(wǎng)小編整理的雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同3篇(雅思是機考還是筆試)，供大家賞析。
雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同1
The range and quality of food has been improved with the development of technology and scientific advance. Some people think it is good and others think it is harmful. Discuss two sides and give your opinion.
雅思大作文模板范文參考：
Technology, the mighty force which is created by the comparatively smaller, walnut-shaped human brain, has changed the landscape, redefined the natural resources and even diversified the food we human beings rely on. The opponents and the proponents both hold their own justifications and I deem that there is no black-or-white conclusion of this issue.
It is more likely that food shortage will undermine the wellbeing of masses less frequently if technology and scientific breakthrough improve the quality and range of choices. In the past when we human beings relied heavily on the rather limited sources of food, a spell of abnormal weather can pose a threat to the yield of the crops and the health condition of livestock, let alone the unpredicted climate change. However, the miserable past is no longer the case today. People are less prone to the impact of scarcity of the food supply and the quality as more food sources can be utilized with the advancement of science.
On the other hand, the skeptics think technology a two-edged sword and the potential risks of technologically-modified food can never be underestimated. The security of some food generated by technology has not been identified, thereby entailing some unpredictable consequences. The genetically modified food, a milestone in human history, provides more options of food and enhance the quality on the one hand, also induces the doubts on its potential harm to human body and health.
Personally, I suppose a reconciliation should be achieved between this two statements. What really matters on this issue is how properly the technologically- changed food can function in the society and what the following steps we shall take if some dire consequences arise. After all , it is the tiny brain that has the final say instead of the technology it creates.
雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同2
People believe that using mobile phones and computers to communicate. Therefore, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
雅思大作文模板范文參考：
Now you are benefiting from the use of mobile phone and the Internet as social interaction media, could you imagine what your daily lives would be without these inventions? Some people claim that individuals are gradually losing face-to-face communication skills. Nevertheless, from personal perspective, online communication cannot make people lose the ability of offline communication.
Apparently, excessive use of the Internet and mobile phones has been undermining our interpersonal relationship offline. Even during a face-to-face conversation, it is no rare thing that everyone is busy looking at his cellphones, neglecting his friends or families across the dinner table. In addition, it has become incredibly easy to contact each other electronically and share information instantly in social community. Gone are the days when people could only communicate via fixed telephone or writing letters which took several days to reach others. So no one is not crazy about smart phones and computers which boast cutting-edge functions like sharing photos and videos with more friends simultaneously.
In spite of the popularity of technological progress mentioned above, never should we turn a blind eye to the irreplaceablity of face-to-face communication. It is common that many schools impart knowledge to students by teaching in classrooms instead of distance education. The same is true of the cooperation among companies, which needs face to face conversation to acquire trust with each other in advance. Furthermore, although online contact may possess increasing numbers of friends, the permanence of mutual relationships cannot lack face-to-face interactions, which can be confirmed by the example of the closest friends and even loving couples. Besides, solving tricky issues are generally more effective and more convenient by surrounding colleagues or friends than by those who live and work in remote places and need online communication.
雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同
雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同3
一、雅思寫作機考和筆試的異同
UKVI雅思機考所針對的只是學(xué)術(shù)類雅思考試，因此寫作的考試內(nèi)容是小作文與大作文。
相同點：
與筆試相同，雅思寫作機考也是給出大小作文的題目，小作文也會給出相應(yīng)的圖表。做題順序自己能夠自由選擇。兩種考試都會給草稿紙。
不同點：
有不同之處，即大作文要求把文章寫在答題紙上，但是機考要求把文章直接敲在答題框中。以下是小作文、大作文的機考界面，考生們要認(rèn)真的看下：
可以看出機考界面會自動計數(shù)大家的寫作字?jǐn)?shù)，考生不需要又去估算自己的字?jǐn)?shù)是不是達(dá)標(biāo)的問題了。而且雅思寫作的字?jǐn)?shù)大概是250字左右，相當(dāng)于答題框?qū)懮弦话氡阈辛恕Ｒ虼丝忌膊槐叵窆P試一樣，擔(dān)心答題紙不夠用的問題。
二、如何應(yīng)對雅思考試寫作機考的變化
與筆試相比，雅思寫作機考更加的人性化?？忌枰盐恼虑么虻綄?yīng)的答題框里即可。同時答題框與題目在同一個界面上，適合考生做題。除此之外考生根本不用害怕文章的保存與字?jǐn)?shù)夠不夠的問題以及字跡難看的問題。
當(dāng)考生們備考寫作時需要抓住的有2個方面。其一是快速掌握各類文章結(jié)構(gòu)的寫法，積累常見的素材。這樣在考場不論碰到的題目是什么，都能夠快速地確定文章結(jié)構(gòu)，構(gòu)思文章行文順序，并有新鮮的素材充實文章。其二是把打字速度提升。寫作總共需要完成400~460左右的字，如果考生打字太慢，或者總是忙中出錯，時間到了，考試會自動結(jié)束，勢必會影響考生的寫作考試成績。
雅思寫作機考與筆試的異同3篇(雅思是機考還是筆試)相關(guān)文章：
★ 雅思寫作考試決定成敗的六個細(xì)節(jié)3篇(細(xì)節(jié)決定雅思閱讀成敗)
★ 雅思寫作提高之從5分到6.5分的5天過程3篇(雅思寫作5.5分是什么水平)