下面是范文網(wǎng)小編整理的GREArgument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略3篇，供大家參考。

GREArgument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略1

　　A lot of countries have schools that focus only on the males or females. What are the advantages and disadvantages of unisexual schools?

(Sample 1)

　　Imagine being asked to spend twelve or so years of years of your life in a society that consisted only of members of your own sex, how would you react? Unless there was something definitely wrong with you, you wouldn't be too happy about it, to say the least. But the fact is that segregated schools shoot up very rapidly around the world, furthermore, so many parents choose to impose such abnormal conditions on their children- conditions which they themselves wouldn't put up with for one minute!

　　Many sociologists and educationalists present their views on this issue from both sides. Those advocates of segregated schools argue that children from segregated schools have greater achievements academically. Socially in athletic and have greater self-confidence. Further, there are many more practical advantages in segregated schools such as administration. Adolescent problems can be dealt with better and more easily. Lastly in many countries, the most famous schools are segregated. It is a wonderful proof of their worth.

　　On the other side, those advocates of co-education point out that any discussion of this topic is bound to question the aims of education. One of the chief aims of education is equip future citizens with all they require to take their places in adult society which is made up of men and women. When segregated, boys and girls are made to feel that they are a race apart. Rivalry between the sexes is fostered. Anyone entering adult society after years of segregation can only be in for a shock. Segregated schools sometimes provide the right condition for sexual deviation and make children lack of healthy attitude to life that co-education encourages.

　　To sum up, every coin has double sides but from my point of view, I believe that though segregated schools have successfully existed for centuries it is about time somebody exploded that hoary old myth about segregated schools being the better place for your children.

(Sample 2)

　　Boy schools and girl schools shoot up very rapidly both in foreign countries and at home. In China, girl schools have enjoyed a very long history since one hundred years ago. Many sociologists and educationalists present their views on this issue from different angles. In this essay, I will zero in on the advantages and disadvantages of the controversial phenomenon.

　　Some parents prefer to send their children to boy schools or girl schools in the hope that their children can concentrate on study and acquire adequate knowledge and skills because unisexual schools can make out appropriate curriculum and courses for students according to their sexual characteristics. In some girl schools, students have a wider choice of courses such as dancing, music, embroidery and drawing, which can cultivate their feminine elegance and charm.

　　Furthermore, students can devote themselves fully to their study and will not be distracted. Campus love affairs are very common in the current society under the influence of media. Boy schools and girl schools can eradicate contact between different sexes and purify the campus environment.

　　Of course, some experts point out that boy schools and girl schools are not beneficial to the adolescent development of students. They believe that boys or girls are likely to develop their abilities and stimulate their imagination when they are studying with the opposite sexes. Besides, students can cultivate their interpersonal skills. Some other people think that separating boys from girls can cause some psychological problems to youngsters. Meanwhile, this separation affects social progress and lead to sexism. Investigation shows that graduates from unisexual schools are not aware how to get along with their colleagues in their career.

　　To sum up, everything has double folds. Unisexual schools are of no exception. From my point of view, I think the existence of unisexual schools meets the need of some parents. But it is definitely not a paradise for their children.

GREArgument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略2

　　隨著GRE作文考試的普及，其對(duì)考生真實(shí)寫作能力的反饋，使越來越多的學(xué)校要求申請(qǐng)入學(xué)的學(xué)生提供此項(xiàng)成績。GREAnalyticalWriting部分包括：presenting your perspective on an issue(寫作時(shí)間為45分鐘)和argument analysis(寫作時(shí)間為30分鐘)兩部分。

　　要寫好GRE寫作中的Argument部分，首先要熟悉一下思路及寫作方式。一些人寫GRE文章，喜歡用專業(yè)性的邏輯用語，其實(shí)沒有必要，就事論事比較好。在批駁的時(shí)候?yàn)榱孙@得有力，可以多用用for example，it is possible that，it is likely that之類的句型，因?yàn)閍rgument就是挑錯(cuò)與找茬的過程，如果實(shí)在覺得錯(cuò)誤不好找，那么就根據(jù)每一句話批，基本上，每一個(gè)表示原因的句子中都可能存在邏輯錯(cuò)誤。

　　一、關(guān)于論證、論據(jù)和論點(diǎn)

　　有人認(rèn)為，argument背一下錯(cuò)誤分類就可以了。但是在實(shí)踐中這些只是次要的方面，主要的還在于尋找論述者的論據(jù)和事實(shí)是否對(duì)論點(diǎn)做了充分且必要的證明。只有找出他們之間的缺點(diǎn)和不足文章才會(huì)流暢。掌握邏輯的因果關(guān)系，更好的把握文章的結(jié)論會(huì)寫出更漂亮的文章，而不是僅僅的survey、response、data等一些誰都用的東西，無論什么都是越具體越有說服力。

　　要注意論據(jù)與論點(diǎn)之間的承接和遞進(jìn)，這一點(diǎn)也是造成文章微觀上邏輯不好的重要原因。往往是這樣一種情況：大體上看總論點(diǎn)分論點(diǎn)結(jié)尾很明確清楚，可一到具體的每一段，就感覺跟在論點(diǎn)之后的論據(jù)來得很突兀，只是論點(diǎn)—論據(jù)—結(jié)尾，缺少了深入的分析和思考。這就要求我們?cè)谡擖c(diǎn)和論據(jù)之間加一些適當(dāng)?shù)姆治鲂哉Z言過渡一下;在論點(diǎn)和每一段的結(jié)論之間如果適合的話也分析或遞進(jìn)一下。

　　二、關(guān)于論證方法

　　例證是第一推薦的論證方法。首先寫作文不像做數(shù)學(xué)題目：照著公理定律往下一步步推就行了。現(xiàn)實(shí)世界中放之四海而皆準(zhǔn)的東西寥寥無幾，用邏輯的方法推演往往會(huì)使文章顯得說服力不強(qiáng)。其次，推理對(duì)語言的要求往往比敘事要高得多;要是再用英文寫作，犯錯(cuò)誤的概率就更大了。再次，雖說字?jǐn)?shù)不是最重要的，但一定的字?jǐn)?shù)對(duì)于想拿高分的同學(xué)還是非常必要的;而從字?jǐn)?shù)上來考慮，例證要占優(yōu)勢。

　　每一個(gè)argument都有它的獨(dú)特性，關(guān)鍵是通過總結(jié)模版了解怎樣論述批駁一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)，說明一個(gè)問題的思路很重要，針對(duì)性也很重要。有的題目，如果用例子來說明，會(huì)更好一些，事實(shí)勝于雄辯嗎。

　　文章有沒有說服力，其實(shí)例子幾個(gè)就夠了。所舉例子一定要能充分證明論點(diǎn)，因?yàn)槔硬缓貌磺‘?dāng)幾乎是每篇文章都有的問題。關(guān)鍵是能不能靈活的應(yīng)用，能不能服務(wù)于論點(diǎn)，還有就是生活中身邊的例子我們最最熟悉的那些才是最生動(dòng)的，最獨(dú)特的，也是最有說服力的，尤其是教育類能用上很多。一般最有說服力的不是那些放之四海皆準(zhǔn)的閃光句型。例子是很個(gè)性化的東西，大家都用一樣的例子，又有什么意思?例子的選擇不一定必須是名人名言或名人的事跡，也不一定非得投老外的口味，用外國的例子，身邊的小事也可以的，能充分證明觀點(diǎn)即可。

　　使用和自己生活、專業(yè)結(jié)合比較多的例子。比較好的原因有二：一是自己比較熟悉，可以自圓其說，二是就是自己的東西，不用花太多心思去背。當(dāng)然了，這不是說，不需要你去擴(kuò)充你的例子，而是要有針對(duì)性的去擴(kuò)充，有一些可以普遍使用的例子還是應(yīng)該熟練掌握的?？梢哉倚┻@種用途廣泛的例子儲(chǔ)備。

　　三、關(guān)于備考方略

　　首先，必須盡早開始限時(shí)練習(xí)。有很多人都以為剛開始寫好一點(diǎn)花多長時(shí)間都值得其實(shí)到后來發(fā)現(xiàn)根本不是這樣，限時(shí)和不限時(shí)兩種感覺完全不同。限時(shí)之后就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)，沒有固定的套路在三十分鐘內(nèi)基本不可能完整的寫出一篇從沒見過的argument。這里的套路不是大家都熟知的在網(wǎng)上和書上流行的摸版。而是自己總結(jié)出來的一套寫作模式，更重要的是思維模式。

　　一般不推崇使用模版，每個(gè)人要有自己的寫作套路，別人的模版盡量不要直接拿來用，畢竟那些還是別人的東西，最好自己能弄出來自己的風(fēng)格來。而寫作套路，就是仁者見仁，智者見智的事情了，練習(xí)作多了，提綱列多了，基本就出來了。

　　其次，要勤寫，多寫。做事不但要講效率，更要講效果。寫的多了未必就有效果，很可能是在重復(fù)以前早就寫過的論點(diǎn)，早就用過的論據(jù)。關(guān)鍵在于寫一篇要有一篇的效果。

　　第三，還要多改。寫完之后立即改;自己改完之后再請(qǐng)別人改;放一段時(shí)間以后再回過頭來自己改。修改多次之后自然會(huì)有提高。

　　最好，平時(shí)一定要注意積累。句型、短語和相關(guān)單詞的收集和分類很重要。比如對(duì)教育類的主題，一些的單詞和短語是比較有針對(duì)性的，單詞和短語最好從報(bào)紙、網(wǎng)頁、國外的范文里或者網(wǎng)上經(jīng)典文章里搜集，如果自己亂猜亂湊可能適得其反，而且每次用都覺得心里七上八下。

　　一些相關(guān)的文科知識(shí)是必須具備的。比如經(jīng)常遇到的民主、自由、政府、和平等等，這些東西雖然大家都懂，但都不是很深入的了解。系統(tǒng)的看一些相關(guān)的文章可以幫助我們理解它們的正確含義。

GREArgument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略3

　　GRE作文官方題庫ARGUMENT題目：

　　According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students; under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year the honor code was in place, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students.

【滿分范文賞析】

　　In this report the author concludes that colleges should adopt an honor code in order to reduce the frequency of cheating. To support this conclusion the author points out that the first year after switching from a monitoring system to an honor system the annual number of reported cheating incidents at Groveton College decreased from 30 (as reported by teachers) to 21 (as reported by students following the honor code) and that five years later the number decreased to 14. The author also cites a survey in which most students indicated they would be less likely to cheat under an honor system than if they are closely monitored. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

【本段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本文采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument開頭段結(jié)構(gòu)，即C—A—F的開頭結(jié)構(gòu)。本段首先概括原文的Conclusion，之后簡要提及原文為支持其結(jié)論所引用的一系列Assumption及細(xì)節(jié)，最后給出開頭段到正文段的過渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即這些Assumption無法讓原文的結(jié)論具有說服力。

【本段功能】

　　作為Argument開頭段，本段具體功能就在于發(fā)起攻擊并概括原文的結(jié)論，即大學(xué)應(yīng)該采取和Groveton College相同的Honor code制度以用來避免學(xué)生們考試作弊的情況。本段接下來提到了原文中為支持之前的Conclusion所提供的證據(jù)，即在采用這種制度后，報(bào)告的學(xué)生作弊人數(shù)下降了，以及一個(gè)能表明學(xué)生們對(duì)于考試作弊態(tài)度的調(diào)查。文章提及這些信息，為是在正文段中對(duì)這些Assumption即將進(jìn)行的具體攻擊做鋪墊。

　　First and foremost, the argument relies on the assumptions that Groveton students are just as capable of detecting cheating as faculty monitors, and that these students are just as likely to report cheating whenever they observe it. However, without evidence to substantiate these assumptions one cannot reasonably conclude that the honor code has, in fact, resulted in a decline in the incidence of cheating at Groveton.

【本段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument正文段結(jié)構(gòu)，即先是提及原文的第一個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤，之后分析該邏輯錯(cuò)誤的原因，接下來，進(jìn)一步分析這樣的錯(cuò)誤為什么讓原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

　　作為正文第一段，本段攻擊原文所犯的第一個(gè)重要邏輯錯(cuò)誤——類比類錯(cuò)誤。原文假設(shè)，學(xué)生們擁有和教師一樣的檢測出其他學(xué)生考試作弊的能力，但事實(shí)上這種類比并不一定成立。所以，原文的這個(gè)假設(shè)是不合理的。

　　The argument also assumes that during the five-year period, all other conditions possibly affecting the reported incidence of cheating at Groveton remained unchanged. Such conditions include the number of Groveton students and the overall integrity of the student body. After five years it is entirely possible that these conditions have changed and that the reported decrease in cheating is attributable to one or more such changes. Thus, without ruling out such alternative explanations for the reported decrease, the argument fails to convince me that the honor code has, in fact, contributed to a decline in the incidence of cheating at Groveton.

【本段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument正文段結(jié)構(gòu)，即先是提及原文的第二個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤，之后分析該邏輯錯(cuò)誤的原因，接下來，進(jìn)一步分析這樣的錯(cuò)誤為什么讓原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

　　作為正文第二段，本段攻擊原文所犯的第二個(gè)重要邏輯錯(cuò)誤——類比類錯(cuò)誤。原文假設(shè)在這五年中，Groveton College的其它條件并沒有改變。但事實(shí)上一旦這些條件發(fā)生了改變，原文當(dāng)中的數(shù)據(jù)和細(xì)節(jié)信息不足以說明這種防作弊制度的真實(shí)效果。所以，原文的關(guān)于這種過去和現(xiàn)在的時(shí)間類比是不合理的。

　　Finally, the survey that the author cites might be unreliable in any of three respects: the author fails to assure us that the survey's respondents are representative of all college students, the survey results depend on the honesty and integrity of the respondents and hypothetical predictions about one's future behavior are inherently less reliable than reports of proven behavior. Lacking credible evidence from a reliable survey, the recommendation for the widespread adoption of the honor system becomes invalid.

【本段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument正文段結(jié)構(gòu)，即先是提及原文的第三個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤，之后分析該邏輯錯(cuò)誤的原因，接下來，進(jìn)一步分析這樣的錯(cuò)誤為什么讓原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

　　作為正文第三段，本段攻擊原文所犯的第三個(gè)重要邏輯錯(cuò)誤——樣本類錯(cuò)誤。原文假設(shè)采用的調(diào)查是有說服力的，但該調(diào)查所抽取的學(xué)生樣本并不一定是具有代表性的，有可能學(xué)生們的回答和他們今后的行為是有差異的。所以，原文的這個(gè)樣本類假設(shè)是不成立的。

　　GRE Argument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略

GREArgument實(shí)戰(zhàn)準(zhǔn)備方略3篇相關(guān)文章：